Jan 15, 2026
/
Trends

Remote, Hybrid, or Office-First? What Talent Actually Wants in 2026

The remote vs office debate misses the bigger picture. This article explores how employees across roles really want to work in 2025, and why flexible approaches are outperforming rigid rules.

Remote, Hybrid, or Office-First? What Talent Actually Wants in 2026

Introduction

Few workplace topics generate as much debate as where work should happen.

From high-profile return-to-office mandates to fully remote teams, opinions are often polarised. Some leaders argue that offices are essential for collaboration and culture. Others believe flexibility is now non-negotiable.

But beneath the noise, the reality is more nuanced.

In 2025, most professionals are no longer asking “Can I work remotely?”
They are asking “Do you trust me to do my job?”

The End of a Simple Debate

The pandemic forced organisations across every sector to rethink how work gets done. The result was not a single winning model, but a wide range of outcomes.

Some teams became more productive. Others struggled. Many discovered that the issue wasn’t location at all — it was how work was managed.

Poor communication, unclear expectations, and weak leadership caused problems whether people were at home or in the office. Strong teams, by contrast, adapted quickly regardless of location.

This experience has fundamentally changed employee expectations.

What Talent Actually Values Now

Across industries, experienced professionals tend to prioritise the same things:

  • Autonomy over how they structure their day
  • Clear expectations and outcomes
  • Trust-based performance measurement
  • Time to focus without constant interruption
  • A sense that their time is respected

Location matters — but mostly as a signal of these deeper values.

Flexible working is no longer seen as a perk. It’s often interpreted as evidence of a mature, well-run organisation.

Why Rigid Office Policies Are Losing Appeal

Many businesses justify office-first policies using arguments around collaboration, culture, and productivity. In practice, these outcomes are far from guaranteed.

For many roles, enforced office attendance can lead to:

  • Increased interruptions and meetings
  • More time spent commuting with little added value
  • A focus on presence rather than performance

When flexibility is removed without a clear rationale, employees often interpret it as a lack of trust rather than a business necessity.

That perception matters — particularly in competitive hiring markets.

Hybrid Work: A Solution That Requires Design

Hybrid working is frequently presented as the “best of both worlds”, but it is also the most difficult model to get right.

Common pitfalls include:

  • Decisions being made by those physically present
  • Remote staff feeling overlooked or excluded
  • Inconsistent expectations across teams

Hybrid only works when organisations are deliberate about communication, documentation, and inclusion. Without this, it can quickly become the least satisfying option for everyone involved.

Senior Talent Is Driving the Shift

More experienced professionals now expect flexibility as a baseline.

They have proven they can deliver outcomes without constant supervision. Many have managed projects, teams, or clients across locations and time zones. For them, rigid working models often feel outdated.

As a result, work-location policies have become a major decision factor — not just about convenience, but about how an organisation thinks and operates.

Location as a Cultural Signal

How a company approaches working location sends a strong message.

  • Flexibility signals trust
  • Outcome-based measurement signals maturity
  • Rigid rules signal risk aversion and control

Candidates notice these signals long before they sign a contract. In interviews, they are often assessing culture as closely as the role itself.

There Is No Universal Answer

Despite strong opinions, there is no single “correct” working model.

High-performing organisations tend to:

  • Be clear about why their model exists
  • Define when in-person work adds value
  • Measure performance by outcomes, not visibility
  • Give managers the tools to lead effectively

The key is intention and consistency, not ideology.

What This Means for Hiring in 2025

To attract and retain strong talent, organisations need to move beyond blanket policies and simplistic narratives.

Candidates are not demanding total freedom. They are looking for:

  • Clarity
  • Fairness
  • Trust
  • A working model that makes sense for the role

Businesses that can articulate why they work the way they do — and back it up in practice — are far more likely to win the talent they want.

Final Thought

The future of work is not remote, hybrid, or office-first.

It is trust-first.

And in a labour market where good people have options, trust has become one of the most valuable benefits an employer can offer.

Mat Smith

Mat Smith

Managing Director

How people want to work has changed. Flexibility, trust, and purpose are now more important than strict remote or office-based rules.